Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (Per 23-4/5/6): 31-38, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042504

ABSTRACT

Creatine supplementation has not been researched for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) extensively, but studies suggest potential as a neuroprotective agent and potential treatment for brain-injury complications. Patients suffering from TBI experience mitochondrial dysfunction, neuropsychological burden, and deficits in cognitive performance due to malperformance of brain creatine levels, diminished brain Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) levels, glutamate toxicity, and oxidative stress. In this systemic review, the current available research is reviewed to examine the effects of creatine on common sequalae of TBI within children, adolescents, and mice. Past and present data still lacks the knowledge of creatine supplementation for the adult population and military members during TBI. PubMed was searched for studies which assessed the correlation between creatine supplementation of TBI complications. The search strategy yielded 40 results, of which 15 articles were included in this systemic review. The results of the review supported an apparent understanding creatine does offer an obvious benefit to patients suffering from TBI and post-injury complications under specific guidelines. Time and dose dependent metabolic alterations seem to be only exceptionally prevalent when given as a prophylaxis or if given acutely. Results are only clinically significant after a month of supplementation. Although patients may need many therapeutic treatments to recover from TBI, especially in acute resuscitation, creatine shows superior efficacy as a neuroprotective agent in battling the chronic manifestations which lead to oxidative stress and cognitive function post brain injury.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Brain Injuries , Neuroprotective Agents , Animals , Mice , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/drug therapy , Creatine/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Neuroprotection , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use
2.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (Per 23-4/5/6): 65-71, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Introduction: The purpose of this review is to explore intermittent fasting (IF) versus continuous energy restriction as a treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The precursor to diabetes is obesity, which currently threatens the Department of Defense's ability to retain and recruit adequate service members. Intermittent fasting may be an adjunct for prevention of obesity and diabetes in the armed forces. OBJECTIVES: Weight loss and lifestyle modification are long-standing treatments for T2DM. The objective of this review is to compare IF to continuous energy restriction. METHODS: PubMed was searched from August 2013 to March 2022 for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and case series. Inclusion criteria were studies which monitored HbA1C, fasting glucose levels, diagnosis of T2DM, ages 18-75, and a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2. Eight articles met these criteria and were selected. These 8 articles were separated into Categories A and B for this review. Category A includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and Category B consists of pilot studies and clinical trials. RESULTS: Intermittent fasting proved to have commensurate decreases in HbA1C and BMI compared to the control group, but not to a statistically significant degree. It cannot be said that IF is better than continuous energy restriction. CONCLUSION: More research is needed on this topic as 1 in 11 people suffer from T2DM. The benefits of IF are apparent, but there is not enough breadth of research available to affect clinical guidelines.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Intermittent Fasting , United States , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Glycated Hemoglobin , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Obesity
3.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (Per 23-4/5/6): 39-49, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042505

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Military first responders are in a unique category of the healthcare delivery system. They range in skill sets from combat medic and corpsman to nurses, physician assistants, and occasionally, doctors. Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of preventable battlefield death, and the decision for intervention to obtain an airway depends on the casualty's presentation, the provider's comfort level, and the available equipment, among many other variables. In the civilian prehospital setting cricothyroidotomy (cric) success rates are over 90%, but in the US military combat environment success rates range from 0-82%. This discrepancy in success rates may be due to training, environment, equipment, patient factors and/or a combination of these. Many presumed causes have been assumed to be the root of the variability, but no research has been conducted evaluating the first-person point of view. This research study is focused on interviewing military first responders with real-life combat placement of a surgical airway to identify the underlying influences which contribute to their perception of success or failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews to understand participants' real-life cric experiences. The interview questions were developed based on the Critical Incident Questionnaire. In total, there were 11 participants-4 retired military and 7 active-duty service members. RESULTS: Nine themes were generated from the 11 interviews conducted. These themes can be categorized into 2 groups: factors internal to the provider, which we have called intrinsic influences, and factors external to the provider, which we call extrinsic influences. Intrinsic influences include personal well-being, confidence, experience, and decision-making. Extrinsic influences include training, equipment, assistance, environment, and patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed practitioners in combat settings felt the need to train more frequently in a stepwise fashion while following a well-understood airway management algorithm. More focus must be on utilizing live tissue with biological feedback, but only after anatomy and geospatial orientation are well understood on models, mannequins, and cadavers. The equipment utilized in training must be the equipment available in the field. Lastly, the focus of the training should be on scenarios which stress the physical and mental capabilities of the providers. A true test of both self-efficacy and deliberate practice is forced through the intrinsic and extrinsic findings from the qualitative data. All of these steps must be overseen by expert practitioners. Another key is providing more time to focus on medical skills development, which is critical to overall confidence and overcoming hesitation in the decision-making process. This is even more specific to those who are least medically trained and the most likely to encounter the casualty first, EMT-Basic level providers. If possible, increasing the number of medical providers at the point of injury would achieve multiple goals under the self-efficacy learning theory. Assistance would instill confidence in the practitioner, help with the ability to prioritize patients quickly, decrease anxiety, and decrease hesitation to perform in the combat environment.


Subject(s)
Airway Management , Airway Obstruction , Clinical Competence , Emergency Responders , Military Personnel , Humans , Airway Management/methods , Airway Management/psychology , Airway Management/standards , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Airway Obstruction/surgery , Airway Obstruction/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Military Personnel/education , Military Personnel/psychology , Emergency Responders/education , Emergency Responders/psychology , Clinical Competence/standards
4.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (Per 22-04/05/06): 56-61, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373322

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, the Expeditionary Resuscitative Surgical Team 3 (ERST-3) published a retrospective review on the ground casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) options available to a Special Operations Forces (SOF) unit in the Horn of Africa. Seventeen months following their deployment, ERST-7 provided an update on the improvised ground evacuation platforms in the same area of operations and what has and has not worked based on combat experience and new literature. METHODS: This publication is an update to a retrospective review of various modes of ground transportation used by ERST-7 during their deployment with Special Operations Command Africa from July 2020 to January 2021. The authors excluded all hand-carried litter and air evacuation platforms. The authors discuss litter setup, necessary modifications, litter capacity, strengths and weaknesses, and any recommendations for a Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, a full-size pickup truck, and a mid-size pickup truck based on their use during the ERST-7 deployment. The authors also used previous literature to support their recommendations. RESULTS: The SOF unit to which ERST-7 was assigned still uses two of the four platforms included in the original study. The authors recommend continued use of the MRAP for patient extraction with a solely widthwise patient configuration, weather-proofing the open beds of MRAPs, and outfitting all MRAPs for Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) if the CASEVAC-designated MRAP is disabled. The pickup trucks functioned well for expedient CASEVAC under non-hostile conditions. However, they should be a last resort for CASEVAC outside friendly-controlled areas due to inadequate cover and concealment for patients and medical personnel providing enroute care. CONCLUSIONS: Vehicles of opportunity available to SOF personnel are constantly changing. Continuous evaluation of local platforms is crucial, especially for partner force personnel who may not have access to dedicated air and ground MEDEVAC platforms. The authors recommend baseline readiness training on CASEVAC scenarios for those units traveling to areas without MEDEVAC assets.


Subject(s)
Military Medicine , Africa , Humans , Military Medicine/education , Resuscitation , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Spec Oper Med ; 22(1): 76-80, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open penetrating trauma wounds to the extremities remain the most common injuries encountered in combat and are frequently complicated by bacterial infections. These infections place a heavy burden on the Servicemember and the healthcare system as they often require multiple additional procedures and can frequently cause substantial debility. Previous studies have shown that vancomycin powder has demonstrated efficacy in decreasing infection risks in clean and contaminated orthopedic surgical wounds. METHODS: This review evaluates the most prevalent organisms cultured post-trauma, the current Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis, and relevant research of vancomycin's prophylactic use. RESULTS: Results from previous studies have shown a time-dependent reduction in bacterial load when vancomycin powder is introduced early post injury in traumatic orthopedic wounds. Furthermore, perioperative application affords a cost-effective method to prevent infection with minimal adverse effects. DISCUSSION: The current TCCC guidelines advocate for the use of antibiotics at the point of injury. When vancomycin powder is used in synergy with these guidelines, it can contribute a timely and powerful antibiotic to prevent infection. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic use of vancomycin powder is a promising adjunctive agent to current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG), but it cannot be conclusively determined to be effective without further research into its application in traumatic combat wounds.


Subject(s)
Vancomycin , Wounds, Penetrating , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Humans , Powders , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
6.
Mil Med ; 187(1-2): e47-e51, 2022 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742658

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a major source of military-related morbidity and mortality. The insidious short- and long-term sequelae of mild TBIs (mTBIs) have come to light, with ongoing research influencing advances in patient care from point of injury onward. Although the DoDI 6490.11 outlines mTBI care in the deployed setting, there is currently no standardized training requirement on mTBI care in the far-forward deployed setting. As the Joint Trauma System (JTS) is considered to be one of the leaders in standard of care trauma medicine in the deployed environment and is often the go-to resource for forward-deployed medical providers, it is our goal that this review be utilized by the JTS with prominent mTBI resources to disseminate a clinical practice guideline (CPG) appropriate for the far-forward operational environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The resources used for this review reflect the most current data, knowledge, and recommendations associated with research and findings from reputable sources as the Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence (TBI CoE; formerly the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as prominent journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, British Journal of Sports Medicine, and JAMA. We searched for articles under keyword searches, limiting results to less than 5 years old, and had military relevance. About 1,740 articles were found using keywords; filters on our search yielded 707 articles, 100 of which offered free full text. The topic of far-forward deployed management of mTBI does not have a robust academic background at this time, and recommendations are derived from a combination of academic evidence in more traditional clinical settings, as well as author's direct experience in managing mTBI casualties in the austere environment. RESULTS: At the time of this writing, there is no JTS CPG for management of mTBI and there is no pre-deployment training requirement for medical providers for treating mTBI casualties in the far-forward deployed setting. The TBI CoE does, however, have a multitude of resources available to medical providers to assist with post-mTBI care. In this article, we review these clinical tools, pre-planning considerations including discussions and logistical planning with medical command, appropriate evaluation and treatment for mTBI casualties based on TBI CoE recommendations, the need for uniform and consistent documentation and diagnosis in the acute period, tactical and operational considerations, and other considerations as a medical provider in an austere setting with limited resources for treating casualties with mTBIs. CONCLUSIONS: Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with mTBIs, as well as operational and tactical considerations in the austere deployed setting, improved acute and subacute care, as well as standardization of care for these casualties within their area of operations is necessary. The far-forward deployed medical provider should be trained in management of mTBI, incorporate mTBI-associated injuries into medical planning with their command, and discuss the importance of mTBI management with servicemembers and their units. Proper planning, training, standardization of mTBI management in the deployed setting, and inter-unit cooperation and coordination for mTBI care will help maintain servicemember readiness and unit capability on the battlefield. Standardization in care and documentation in this austere military environment may also assist future research into mTBI management. As there is currently no JTS CPG covering this type of care, the authors recommend sharing the TBI CoE management guideline with medical providers who will be reasonably expected to evaluate and manage mTBI in the austere deployed setting.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Brain Injuries , Military Personnel , Brain , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/therapy , Child, Preschool , Humans
7.
J Knee Surg ; 32(2): 196-204, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514370

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation is to report on trends over time in the treatment of meniscal pathology among military orthopaedic surgeons, as well as to evaluate the impact of patient demographics and concomitant procedure on the type of meniscal procedure performed. We performed a retrospective analysis of all active-duty United States military servicemembers who underwent a meniscal procedure from 2010 to 2015 within the Military Health System. Patient demographics and surgical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. Treatments were categorized by location and by type of intervention (i.e., repair or debridement). Chi-square and linear regression analyses were performed to identify temporal trends in meniscal procedures and factors that were correlated with the type of meniscal procedure performed. Out of 29,571 meniscal procedures analyzed, partial meniscectomy was performed in 81.3% (n = 24,343) of cases, meniscal repair in 20.3% (n = 6,073), and meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) in 0.7% (n = 206). The rates of debridement, repair, and concomitant surgeries did not demonstrate any significant temporal trends, whereas MAT demonstrated a significant decrease in overall utilization. Nearly two-thirds of all meniscal procedures were performed in the medial compartment. MAT occurred equally between the medial and lateral compartments. Lateral meniscal lesions demonstrated significantly higher rates of debridement. With each year of advancing age, there was a 3.7% increasing likelihood of meniscectomy and 6.5% decreasing likelihood of repair. Females were more likely to undergo meniscal repair than males. Patients in the military population were more likely to undergo meniscal repair compared with previously reported rates in the civilian population. In this physically active cohort of nearly 30,000 military patients, 1 in 5 meniscal tears were treated with meniscal repair. Meniscal repairs were performed at a higher rate for all age groups compared with previously reported rates in the civilian population. Further research is required to elucidate the causative factors behind these differences and the effect on postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : IV, cross-sectional study.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/epidemiology , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Allografts , Cross-Sectional Studies , Debridement/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Meniscectomy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...